Document Type

Article

Publication Date

7-2015

Abstract

If an inclusionary housing ordinance is regarded as an “exaction”—because it compelled a developer to pay through land dedication or in-lieu fees—then the city must show that (1) there was a reasonable relationship between the deleterious effects of the new housing and the economic burden imposed on the developer —the nexus—and (2) the burden is reasonably proportional to the problems created by the development.

Comments

From Real Property Law Reporter (Cal CEB [July 2015]) © The Regents of the University of California, reprinted with permission of CEB.

Download

Share

COinS