The economic loss rule: Robinson Helicopter v Dana (2004)

Authors

Roger Bernhardt, Golden Gate University School of LawFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2004

Abstract

This article discusses a California Supreme Court case which held that the economic-loss rule does not bar tort recovery—compensatory and punitive damages—in a claim for intentional misrepresentation or fraud independent of a claim for breach of contract as might be applied to construction litigation.

Comments

First published in Continuing Education of the Bar, California, Real Property Law Reporter.

Recommended Citation

Bernhardt, Roger, "The economic loss rule: Robinson Helicopter v Dana (2004)" (2004). Publications. 389.
https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/pubs/389