Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2003
Abstract
This article discusses a California case which held that a law firm not barred from representing its client in a lawsuit contending that a promissory note it prepared on the client’s behalf was usurious under California law.
Recommended Citation
Bernhardt, Roger, "Conflict of interest from preparing note used by client: Hetos Invs., Ltd. v Kurtin, 2003" (2003). Publications. 264.
https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/pubs/264
Comments
First published in Continuing Education of the Bar, California, Real Property Law Reporter.