Golden Gate University Law Review | Vol 26 | Iss 1

Skip to main content

Golden Gate University Law Review

Ninth Circuit Survey

Volume 26 Masthead

Introduction

Table of Cases Noted and Summarized

Personnel of the Court

Preface
Caren Jenkins

Comments

Destination Ventures, Ltd. v. F.C.C. and Moser v. F.C.C.: How Much Should the Telephone Consumer Protection Act Restrict Your Phone, Fax and Computer?
Michael D. McConathy

Are Rule 26(c) Protective Orders Viable Against Grand Juries? The Ninth Circuit Rejects Balancing Test in Favor of a per se Rule: United States v. Janet Greeson's A Place for Us (in re Grand Jury Subpoena Served on Meserve)
Dane L. Steffenson

Notes

Renewed Compassion for the Dying in Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington
Cara Elkin

McKenzie v. Day: Is Twenty Years on Death Row Cruel and Unusual Punishment?
Amber A. Bell

The Constitutionality of Mandatory, Presentence Urine Testing of Convicted Defendants
Joshua W. Rose

Crawford v. Gould: Federal Statute Gives Financial Boon to State Institutionalized Psychiatric Patients
Paul Webb

Standing Committee on Discipline v. Yagman: The Ninth Circuit Provides Substantial First Amendment Protection for Attorney Criticism of the Judiciary
Jeffrey A. White

After United States v. Vaneaton, Does Payton v. New York Prevent Police from Making Warrantless Routine Arrests Inside the Home?
Bryan Murray

Select an issue:

Advanced Search