Document Type
Opinion
Publication Date
1-22-1954
Docket No.
L. A. No. 22321
Citation
42 Cal. 2d 110; 266 P.2d 14; 1954
Abstract
In computing gross receipts to determine the amount to be paid by a telephone company for using public streets, a ratio based on relative investment was necessary and only the allocation of receipts for the actual franchise area was allowed.
Recommended Citation
Carter, Jesse W., "San Diego v. Southern California Tel. Corp. [DISSENT]" (1954). Jesse Carter Opinions. 272.
https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/carter_opinions/272