Golden Gate University Law Review


This comment compares the Ninth Circuit's holding with the approaches other courts have taken regarding loss of society damages and the dependency rule for awarding such recovery in maritime wrongful death actions. This comment concludes that, although the Ninth Circuit's decision was an empathetic attempt at developing the law of maritime damages, the holding's glaring conflict with the spirit of the maritime remedial statutory scheme is exemplary of a growing problem in maritime law. Specifically, as judges struggle to keep the rules of admiralty current with common law developments outside the maritime context, the separation of judge-made doctrine from Congressional policy widens within admiralty jurisdiction, thereby creating new and greater anomalies in admiralty uniformity, more uncertainty for admiralty practitioners, and unfair results for some maritime tort victims.

Files over 3MB may be slow to open. For best results, right-click and select "save as..."

Included in

Admiralty Commons