Golden Gate University Law Review
Abstract
This comment examines the unequal treatment of United States citizens who are labeled enemy combatants by looking at the factual and procedural background of Padilla, Hamdi and Lindh. Next, this comment examines the origins of the label enemy combatant and the constitutional safeguards afforded to criminal defendants in similar situations as Padilla, Hamdi,and Lindh. The terrorist acts Padilla, Hamdi, and Lindh are accused of involve international laws. Therefore, this comment will examine the Geneva Conventions as a means to understand humanitarian protections that may cover Padilla and Hamdi. Finally, this comment will provide recommendations for some of the issues raised.
Recommended Citation
Irma Alicia Cabrera Ramirez,
Unequal Treatment of United States Citizens: Eroding the Constitutional Safeguards, 33 Golden Gate U. L. Rev.
(2003).
https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev/vol33/iss2/5