Golden Gate University Law Review
Article Title
Finding Likelihood of Confusion with Actual Confusion: A Critical Analysis of the Federal Courts' Approach
Abstract
This comment asserts that federal courts do not decide the likelihood of confusion issue by using these theories. Instead, the typical likelihood of confusion dispute is decided by giving actual confusion more weight than other analytical elements, despite courts' claims that they give the elements equal weight and consideration.
Recommended Citation
Edwin S. Clark,
Finding Likelihood of Confusion with Actual Confusion: A Critical Analysis of the Federal Courts' Approach, 22 Golden Gate U. L. Rev.
(1992).
https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev/vol22/iss2/7