Golden Gate University Law Review
Abstract
This Note discusses how sexism in the jury selection and voir dire processes can operate to produce a voir dire which violates of a prospective juror's guarantee of equal protection. It then outlines California's use of strict scrutiny to analyze gender-based classifications. Third, the Note reviews and evaluates the three Bobb opinions. Finally, the significance of Justice Miller's opinion is discussed.
Recommended Citation
Randy Riddle,
Bobb v. Municipal Court: A Challenge to Sexism in Jury Selection and Voir Dire, 14 Golden Gate U. L. Rev.
(1984).
https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev/vol14/iss3/15