Document Type
Opinion
Publication Date
6-28-1951
Docket No.
S. F. Nos. 18331, 18332
Citation
37 Cal. 2d 430; 233 P.2d 4; 1951
Abstract
Certificate holders could not recover the difference between the price at which their assignors sold their certificates and the face amount thereof because they failed to show there was any matured claim or debt due at the time they sold them.
Recommended Citation
Carter, Jesse W., "King v. Mortimer [DISSENT]" (1951). Jesse Carter Opinions. 432.
https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/carter_opinions/432