Document Type
Opinion
Publication Date
4-22-1952
Docket No.
L. A. No. 21794
Citation
38 Cal. 2d 802; 243 P.2d 1; 1952
Abstract
A statutory requirement that a stockholder post security for expenses in a derivative suit filed after the statute's effective date was prospective and procedural, even though the alleged corporate wrongs occurred before the statute's enactment.
Recommended Citation
Carter, Jesse W., "Hogan v. Ingold [DISSENT]" (1952). Jesse Carter Opinions. 413.
https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/carter_opinions/413