Document Type
Opinion
Publication Date
8-13-1952
Docket No.
L. A. No. 22028
Citation
39 Cal. 2d 491; 247 P.2d 341; 1952
Abstract
Where a jury verdict was the result of compromise, there had been no acceptable determination of liability, the driver was entitled to a new trial on that issue, and an order limiting a new trial to the issue of damages was an abuse of discretion.
Recommended Citation
Carter, Jesse W., "Cary v. Wentzel [DISSENT]" (1952). Jesse Carter Opinions. 383.
https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/carter_opinions/383