Document Type
Opinion
Publication Date
11-14-1952
Docket No.
L. A. No. 22035
Citation
39 Cal. 2d 698; 250 P.2d 145; 1952
Abstract
County civil service employees were not entitled to a declaration that a county oath requirement was invalid because the field of loyalty oath requirements for all county employees was not preempted by statute until adoption of the Levering Act.
Recommended Citation
Carter, Jesse W., "Hirschman v. County of Los Angeles [DISSENT]" (1952). Jesse Carter Opinions. 365.
https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/carter_opinions/365