Title
Document Type
Opinion
Publication Date
12-4-1953
Docket No.
L. A. No. 22613
Citation
41 Cal. 2d 712; 264 P.2d 1; 1953
Abstract
A driver was entitled to a jury instruction on the doctrine of imminent peril in a pedestrian's negligence action because the driver may not have anticipated that the pedestrian would not yield the right of way as he walked across the highway.
Recommended Citation
Carter, Jesse W., "Leo v. Dunham [DISSENT]" (1953). Jesse Carter Opinions. 302.
https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/carter_opinions/302