Title
Document Type
Opinion
Publication Date
9-25-1953
Docket No.
L. A. No. 22437
Citation
41 Cal. 2d 509; 261 P.2d 235; 1953
Abstract
The widower was not entitled to receive a portion of his wife's estate, when the language in her will showed her intent not to provide for him in the will, even though the language in the will did not specifically name the widower.
Recommended Citation
Carter, Jesse W., "Estate of Duke [DISSENT]" (1953). Jesse Carter Opinions. 296.
https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/carter_opinions/296