This paper examines and covers relevant provisions of the Uruguay Round Agreements and laws of Nepal, provides arguments favoring and opposing invocability and non-invocability, analyzes the constitutionality and validity of Nepal’s accession to the WTO, the direct applicability of the Uruguay Round Agreements in Nepal’s internal law, and the invocability of the provisions of the Uruguay Round Agreements before the courts of Nepal, and finally draws conclusion on the issue.
"An Issue of Invocability of Provisions of the WTO Covered Agreements Before Domestic Courts,"
Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law:
1, Article 10.
Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/annlsurvey/vol17/iss1/10